Product category:
Machinery/plant guarding and protection
News Release from: Rockwell Automation (Allen-Bradley Guardmaster ) | Subject: Investment in safety systems
Edited by the Manufacturingtalk Editorial
Team on 14 May 2004
Do not skimp on safety systems
investment
Investing in safety is not only right, it is also good for business, says Derek Jones who adds that not investing in safety is short-sighted and can be costly in the long term.
The recent recessionary climate in UK manufacturing industry has meant that many companies have cut costs and investment to the bone in order to remain profitable The ramifications of this policy are felt at all levels of manufacturing even in areas one would least expect such as plant floor safety
This article was originally published on Manufacturingtalk on 15 Jul 2008 at 8.00am (UK)
Related stories
RFID coded safety switch cuts wiring costs
An RFID coded, non-contact safety switch, rated at Category 4/SIL 3, helps reduce machine wiring costs and offers extended diagnostics for easier faultfinding.
SS cable pull switches protect operators
A stainless steel cable pull switch is ideal for internal and external use, providing constant emergency stop access along exposed conveyors and around awkward machinery.
This is undoubtedly short-sighted, says Derek Jones, machinery safety specialist at EJA, as the cost of an accident, in terms of legal action - possible fine - and lost production will greatly outweigh any costs resulting from not using safety equipment.
However, companies not investing in safety equipment can still incur disastrous costs even when accidents do not occur.
A visit from the local HSE Inspectorate can quickly result in a prohibition order on any machine considered to be unsafe.
Further reading
Safety vehicle updates plants on systems
Rockwell Automation's new Safety, Sensor and Connectivity Demonstration Vehicle brings working dynamic machine displays right into the heart of manufacturing facilities.
Monitoring safety relay switches multi-circuits
Category 4 monitoring safety relay provides an easily expandable solution to the problem of switching multi-safety circuits at different voltages from one E-stop.
New materials address RSI in guarding systems
Following the recognition of occupational overuse syndrome (OOS), or RSI as it is more widely known, the role of machine guarding to protect operators has been expanded.
The machine (or machines) so proscribed may be one(s) that are critical to production, so any interruptions could have very serious economic consequences for the company concerned.
Recent research from the USA shows that while the legal/economic imperative for investing in safety is paramount, there is another major reason that most companies are not aware of, namely, that safety is good for business.
As evidence of this, in 1999, when Forbes published its list of the most successful US corporations, many in the top 100 were participants in the Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP) sponsored by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
These programmes are only open to companies implementing safety programs that exceed OSHA standards and result in lost time rates at least 50% below their respective state average.
Not only did these companies set a new benchmark in health and safety management best practices, but they also verified the correlation between plant floor safety and profitability.
The recognition that safety measures weren't a hindrance to productivity, and that safety was truly an investment with positive return, did not happen overnight with these companies.
However, the acceptance of safety as a good business practice is now evident as the number of workplace injuries continues to fall each year.
The US findings are endorsed by my own company's experience in the UK market.
EJA's view is that there are two main arguments, economic and ethical, to challenge companies that are holding back from investing in safety equipment: Although, on first reading, these would seem to be at odds, they are in fact closely linked.
They are linked because safety always pays: a safe machine is unlikely to be shut down by inspectors, or cause costly interruptions to production as a result of an accident.
In addition, by investing in proper safety provision to protect its workforce, a company is fulfilling both its moral obligation and safeguarding its most valuable asset, helping to ensure continuity of future production.
The availability of empirical data such as the reduction in workplace injuries is powerful evidence that a company's commitment to providing a safer workplace boosts employee morale and leads to improved productivity.
However, the productivity gains and cost savings attributed to fewer accidents, reduced medical expenses and legal costs are still often overlooked.
When considering safety in this capacity, its value can be more easily determined by reviewing the costs of time lost due to past injuries.
The direct costs of these incidents, such as workers' compensation, are easy to grasp, but the indirect costs such as lost production time and resources are much more difficult to determine.
The total incident cost, the sum of the direct and indirect costs, is the key to determining the impact of accidents on a company's profitability.
To help companies gauge the impact of occupational injuries on their financial performance, the US- based OSHA has developed free software that can be downloaded from its Web site at
This software takes into account profit margin, average costs of injury and indirect costs (expressed as a multiplier) to project the additional sales a company would have to generate to make up for workplace injuries.
* About the author - Derek Jones is machinery safety specialist with Rockwell Automation (Allen-Bradley Guardmaster).
• Rockwell Automation (Allen-Bradley Guardmaster ): contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Manufacturingtalk email newsletter
• Manufacturingtalk Home Page
Search the Pro-Talk network of sites
