Product category:
Abrasive grinding wheels, abrasives
News Release from: Tyrolit | Subject: Diamond roll dressing of vitrified AlO2 wheels
Edited by the Manufacturingtalk Editorial
Team on 25 January 2007
Best parameters found for grinding wheel
dressing
An Austrian firm has revealed the best parameters to use when using a profiled diamond dressing roll to dress a vitrified aluminium oxide wheel for creep-feed grinding nickel alloys.
For optimum results, a diamond dressing roll must rotate in the same direction as the grinding wheel at the point of contact, and at four-fifths its peripheral speed; and dwell revolutions must be zero Research carried out by Austrian grinding wheel manufacturer, Tyrolit, has identified the best parameters to use when dressing a vitrified aluminium oxide wheel using a rotating profile diamond roll
This article was originally published on Manufacturingtalk on 16 Nov 2005 at 8.00am (UK)
Related stories
Wheel change saves GBP 300,000 on grinding
Grinding wheel change increased camshaft production in 2005 by 40% to 1.4 million units without investing in extra machinery after its engineers undertook a detailed analysis.
Narrow disc cuts thin sheet metal, no burns
To avoid localised heating and abrasive 'burning' and the possibility of having to rework or scrap the job, a 0.75mm disc is claimed to be the thinnest on the market for cutting thin sheet metal.
The theoretical work was tested by dressing a wheel prior to creep feed grinding of nickel alloy, a process widely used in the aerospace manufacturing industry.
The detail of the research is rather weighty, but boils down to an appreciation of how four process variables interact - the relative direction and the peripheral speed differential between rotation of wheel and dresser at the point of contact, the radial infeed speed of the dresser, and the dwell or sparking-out revolutions.
First consideration is relative direction of rotation.
Further reading
Courses instruct on bonded abrasives practices
The UK subsidiary of Tyrolit has introduced a range of training courses to support its customers in applying best practices when using bonded abrasives.
Solid carbide drills, mills ground at lower cost
A new generation of diamond impregnated grinding wheels provide low cost, high productivity manufacture and resharpening of solid carbide drilling and milling tools.
Aluminium oxide wheels can be customised
As well as having excellent profile-holding characteristics, aluminium oxide wheels can contain sintered as well as fused abrasive grains, allowing long-life, customised wheels to be manufactured.
If one follows the trajectory of any single grain of diamond on the rotary dresser, it is easily demonstrated that if the wheel and dresser are moving in opposite directions at the point of contract, denoted by (-), the grain's trajectory into the wheel is low, touching almost tangentially, so the cutting action is soft.
With same-direction (+) rotation, the diamond grain hacks into the wheel, generating a much rougher surface.
Findings show that regardless of dresser infeed speed, the greatest theoretical roughness of the grinding wheel surface after dressing, and hence maximum grinding efficiency, is achieved when the peripheral speed of the dresser and wheel are identical and they move in the same tangential direction.
The reason for this is that the diamond grain does not cut the wheel surface, but instead causes brittle fracture of the abrasive grain and vitrified bond through pressure, resulting in rough surface topography of the wheel.
Unfortunately, this wears down the profile roller very quickly, so the + 1 parameter cannot be used in practice.
Again there is a forbidden zone centered on 1:1 speed ratio and extending either side from + 1.2 to + 0.8, the latter signifying that the dresser is driven at four-fifths the peripheral speed of that of the grinding wheel.
It is this parameter that has been identified as optimal, imparting between 6 and 10 micron of mean surface roughness onto the wheel.
At the same time, + 0.8 preserves the sharpness of the dressing roll, extending the periods between reworking.
The 4 micron spread in surface roughness of the grinding wheel is a result of raising the dresser infeed speed from 0.2 to 0.7 micron/rev, showing that the higher the final roughness (and efficiency) of the grinding wheel, the greater the amount of stock removed from it by dressing and hence the shorter the life of the wheel.
So there is a trade-off between wheel efficiency and consumption that has to be determined for each application.
Allowing the grinding wheel and roll dresser to rotate together without any infeed force for a number of revolutions after dressing, equivalent to sparking out after a grinding cycle, has the effect of diminishing the roughness of the wheel and decreasing grinding efficiency.
The effect is most noticeable with opposite-direction tangential motion of the wheel and dresser, but this is not recommended anyway.
With same-direction tangential motion, a 10 micron surface roughness is halved in little more than 100 dwell revolutions.
The recommended number is zero.
Tyrolit then applied the theoretical parameters to dress one of its aluminium oxide wheels, selecting a medium infeed speed.
Same-direction motion was used with the dresser running at + 0.8 of the grinding wheel speed.
Opposite-direction motion with the same speed differential, ie - 0.8, was also tried.
Further tests were carried out using a speed differential of + 0.4 and - 0.4.
Dwell revolutions were set to zero and then 80 during all tests except the last, which was obviously going to produce a poor result.
Rather than try to measure the surface topography of the grinding wheel after dressing, which is impossible in practice, the wheel was used in creep feed mode to machine a nickel alloy test piece on a Blohm Profimat 412 profile grinder.
The parameters of the grinding operation were measured as well as the surface of the ground nickel.
The practical results closely matched the theory in some important respects - see accompanying illustration (bottom).
They were inconclusive regarding the surface finish of the ground nickel, which showed little variation over all the tests.
The actual spread of mean roughness depth (Rz) on the nickel was 1.6 micron compared with the predicted variation of grinding wheel finish of 4.0 micron.
Nevertheless, the greatest practical Rz of 3.88 micron was found, as predicted, for the wheel dressed using the best theoretical parameters.
What was demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt was that the predicted optimum settings of + 0.8 with zero dwell revolutions was in fact correct.
The clue came from measuring the normal force of the grinding wheel during machining, as well as the power drawn by the motor.
Only 1.037W/160N was recorded for the wheel dressed using the theoretically optimum settings, confirming that free-cutting grinding using a sharp wheel was taking place.
Power drawn and normal force were around 50% higher if 80 dwell revolutions were introduced, and double if in addition the wheel and dresser were counter-rotated at - 0.8.
Halving the differential speed to + 0.4 and returning dwell rotations to zero increased power consumption and wheel force by over 40% compared with the optimum.
Tyrolit's UK subsidiary has since 2004 operated a diamond roll dresser production facility in Crawley, West Sussex, offering a complete range of reverse electroplated dressing products.
• Tyrolit: contact details and other news
• Email this article to a colleague
• Register for the free Manufacturingtalk email newsletter
• Manufacturingtalk Home Page
Search the Pro-Talk network of sites
